Oxylabs vs ProxyShare: Comprehensive Comparison Guide
When choosing between Oxylabs vs ProxyShare, understanding the key differences in performance, pricing, and features is crucial for making the right decision. This comprehensive comparison analyzes both proxy services across multiple dimensions to help you determine which solution best fits your web scraping, data collection, and online privacy needs. Whether you’re a business looking for enterprise-grade proxy solutions or an individual seeking reliable residential proxies, our detailed Oxylabs vs ProxyShare analysis covers everything from network size and success rates to pricing structures and customer support quality.
Service Overview: Oxylabs vs ProxyShare
The Oxylabs Proxy vs ProxyShare comparison reveals two distinct approaches to proxy services. Oxylabs has established itself as a premium enterprise-focused provider with one of the largest proxy networks globally, boasting over 175 million residential IPs and 2 million datacenter proxies. The company targets businesses requiring high-volume data collection, advanced web scraping capabilities, and enterprise-grade reliability.
ProxyShare, on the other hand, positions itself as a more accessible proxy service with competitive pricing and a focus on delivering reliable performance for small to medium-sized businesses. With over 75 million residential proxies in their network, ProxyShare offers a substantial infrastructure while maintaining cost-effectiveness that appeals to price-conscious users.
Ready to Choose Your Proxy Provider?
Compare both services with free trials and find the perfect proxy solution for your needs.
Try Oxylabs Free Trial Explore ProxyShare PlansNetwork Size & Global Coverage Analysis
In the Oxylabs vs ProxyShare network comparison, Oxylabs clearly dominates with significantly more IP addresses and broader geographical coverage. Oxylabs operates the largest residential proxy network globally with over 175 million IPs spanning 195+ countries and territories. This extensive coverage includes city-level targeting capabilities, allowing users to select specific metropolitan areas for their proxy connections.
ProxyShare maintains a respectable network of 75+ million residential proxies with coverage across major global markets. While smaller than Oxylabs, ProxyShare’s network still provides sufficient diversity for most use cases, with strong representation in North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific regions.
Network Size Comparison
| Network Aspect | Oxylabs | ProxyShare |
|---|---|---|
| Residential IPs | 175+ Million | 75+ Million |
| Datacenter IPs | 2+ Million | 10,000+ Static |
| Country Coverage | 195+ Countries | 100+ Countries |
| City Targeting | Yes (Advanced) | Yes (Basic) |
| ISP Targeting | Yes | Limited |
Key Takeaway: Network Coverage
While both providers offer global coverage, Oxylabs’ significantly larger network provides better IP rotation options and reduced risk of IP blocks. ProxyShare’s smaller but well-distributed network still meets most standard requirements while offering better value for cost-conscious users.
Performance & Reliability Comparison
Performance metrics are crucial in the Oxylabs Proxy vs ProxyShare evaluation. According to independent testing by Proxyway’s 2024 Proxy Market Research, Oxylabs achieved an exceptional 99.82% success rate in their global pool testing, making it one of the most reliable proxy services available. The service also demonstrates impressive speed with average response times of just 0.6 seconds for residential proxies.
ProxyShare, while not independently tested in the same comprehensive study, maintains competitive performance levels according to user reports and company specifications. The service emphasizes stability and consistent connection quality, though detailed performance metrics are less publicly available compared to Oxylabs.
Performance Metrics Comparison
| Performance Metric | Oxylabs | ProxyShare |
|---|---|---|
| Success Rate | 99.82% (Verified) | 98%+ (Estimated) |
| Response Time | 0.6 seconds | 1-2 seconds |
| Uptime Guarantee | 99.9% | 99%+ |
| Connection Speed | High (Enterprise-grade) | Good (Standard) |
| IP Rotation | Advanced | Standard |
The performance advantage clearly favors Oxylabs, particularly for enterprise applications requiring maximum reliability and speed. However, ProxyShare’s performance remains adequate for most standard web scraping and data collection tasks, offering a reasonable balance between performance and cost.
Test Oxylabs Performance Try ProxyShare NowPricing Structure & Value Analysis
The pricing comparison in Oxylabs vs ProxyShare reveals significant differences in cost structures and target markets. Oxylabs positions itself as a premium service with pricing that reflects its enterprise-grade features and performance. Residential proxies start at $8 per GB with pay-as-you-go options, while dedicated datacenter proxies begin at $50 per month for basic plans.
ProxyShare offers more competitive pricing with residential proxies ranging from $2.75 to $5.50 per GB depending on the plan, making it significantly more affordable for smaller operations and individual users. This price difference can result in substantial savings, particularly for high-volume usage scenarios.
Pricing Comparison (Per GB for Residential Proxies)
| Service Type | Oxylabs Pricing | ProxyShare Pricing |
|---|---|---|
| Residential Proxies (Pay-as-you-go) | $8.00/GB | $2.75-$5.50/GB |
| Residential Proxies (Monthly Plans) | $6.98-$7.75/GB | $1.75-$4.00/GB |
| Static Residential | $16-$1,150/month | $15-$500/month |
| Datacenter Proxies | $1.20-$2.25/IP | $0.80-$1.50/IP |
| Free Trial | Yes (Limited) | Yes (Standard) |
Cost Savings Analysis
ProxyShare can offer savings of 40-60% compared to Oxylabs for similar proxy volumes. For a business using 100GB monthly, the difference could amount to $300-500 in monthly savings, making ProxyShare particularly attractive for cost-sensitive operations.
While Oxylabs commands premium pricing, it justifies the cost through superior performance metrics, larger network size, and enterprise-grade features. ProxyShare’s competitive pricing makes it accessible to a broader range of users, from individual developers to small businesses operating on tighter budgets.
Features & Capabilities Comparison
The feature set comparison in Oxylabs Proxy vs ProxyShare highlights different approaches to proxy service delivery. Oxylabs offers comprehensive enterprise features including advanced API integration, custom solutions, dedicated account management, and sophisticated targeting options. The platform supports HTTP/HTTPS and SOCKS5 protocols with advanced authentication methods.
ProxyShare focuses on essential features while maintaining simplicity and ease of use. The service provides standard proxy protocols, basic geographic targeting, and straightforward API integration suitable for most common use cases.
| Feature Category | Oxylabs | ProxyShare |
|---|---|---|
| Protocol Support | HTTP/HTTPS, SOCKS5 | HTTP/HTTPS, SOCKS5 |
| API Integration | Advanced RESTful API | Standard API |
| Geographic Targeting | Country, State, City, ISP | Country, City |
| Session Control | Advanced (Up to 24 hours) | Standard (Up to 24 hours) |
| Bandwidth | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Concurrent Connections | High (Enterprise-grade) | Standard |
| Dashboard & Analytics | Comprehensive | Basic |
| Customer Support | 24/7 Dedicated Support | 24/7 Standard Support |
Oxylabs Advantages
- Enterprise-grade infrastructure and reliability
- Largest proxy network globally
- Advanced targeting and filtering options
- Comprehensive API and integration tools
- Dedicated account management
- ISO 27001 certified security
- 99.9% uptime guarantee
Oxylabs Considerations
- Premium pricing structure
- Complex setup for basic users
- Minimum commitments for enterprise plans
- Overkill for simple use cases
ProxyShare Advantages
- Competitive and affordable pricing
- Simple setup and user-friendly interface
- Good performance for standard use cases
- Flexible payment options
- Suitable for small to medium businesses
- Free trial available
ProxyShare Considerations
- Smaller proxy network
- Limited advanced features
- Less geographical targeting options
- Basic customer support compared to enterprise providers
Available Proxy Types & Technologies
Both services in the Oxylabs vs ProxyShare comparison offer multiple proxy types, but with different focuses and capabilities. Oxylabs provides a comprehensive range including residential proxies, datacenter proxies, mobile proxies, and ISP proxies, each optimized for specific use cases and performance requirements.
ProxyShare concentrates on the most commonly used proxy types, offering residential proxies, static residential proxies, and datacenter proxies with competitive performance metrics across each category.
Oxylabs Proxy Types
- Residential Proxies: 175M+ IPs with advanced rotation and targeting
- Datacenter Proxies: 2M+ high-speed dedicated and shared options
- Mobile Proxies: Real 3G/4G/5G connections for mobile-specific tasks
- ISP Proxies: Hybrid solution combining datacenter speed with residential trust
- Static Residential: Long-term residential IPs for consistent access
ProxyShare Proxy Types
- Rotating Residential: 75M+ IPs with automatic rotation
- Static Residential: Dedicated residential IPs for long-term use
- Static Datacenter: High-speed datacenter proxies for fast connections
- SOCKS5 Proxies: Enhanced protocol support for specialized applications
Best Use Cases & Target Audiences
Understanding the optimal use cases helps determine the winner in specific Oxylabs Proxy vs ProxyShare scenarios. Oxylabs excels in enterprise environments requiring maximum reliability, extensive geographic coverage, and advanced features for large-scale operations.
Oxylabs Best Use Cases
- Enterprise web scraping and data harvesting
- Large-scale market research and competitive intelligence
- Ad verification and brand protection campaigns
- Travel fare aggregation and price monitoring
- Social media management at scale
- Cybersecurity and threat intelligence gathering
- SEO monitoring and SERP tracking
ProxyShare Best Use Cases
- Small to medium-scale web scraping projects
- Personal privacy and geo-restriction bypass
- Social media automation and management
- Basic market research and price comparison
- SEO tools and website monitoring
- E-commerce automation and inventory tracking
- Academic research and data collection
Choosing Based on Scale
If your monthly proxy usage exceeds 500GB or requires enterprise-grade reliability, Oxylabs provides better value despite higher costs. For usage under 100GB monthly or budget-conscious operations, ProxyShare offers excellent value proposition with sufficient performance for most use cases.
Customer Reviews & User Experience
Real user feedback provides valuable insights into the Oxylabs vs ProxyShare user experience. Oxylabs maintains a strong 4.2-star rating on Trustpilot with over 680 reviews, with users frequently praising the service’s reliability, performance, and comprehensive customer support.
Customer feedback highlights Oxylabs’ exceptional technical support, with many enterprise users noting the dedicated account management and quick resolution of technical issues. The platform’s extensive documentation and integration guides receive consistent positive mentions.
ProxyShare user reviews, while less numerous, generally focus on the service’s affordability and ease of use. Users appreciate the straightforward setup process and competitive pricing, though some note limitations in advanced features compared to premium providers.
Customer Satisfaction Metrics
Common User Feedback Themes
Oxylabs User Reviews
“Excellent service for enterprise-level scraping. The success rate is consistently high, and their support team is knowledgeable and responsive.” – Enterprise Customer
“While expensive, Oxylabs delivers on their promises. The proxy network is massive and rarely fails even on difficult targets.” – Data Analytics Company
ProxyShare User Reviews
“Great value for money. ProxyShare provides reliable proxies at a fraction of the cost of premium providers.” – Small Business Owner
“Perfect for our startup needs. Easy to set up and the pricing is very competitive for the quality provided.” – Tech Startup
Related: Iproyal vs Webshare
Related: Oxylabs Proxy vs Webshare Proxy
Final Verdict: Oxylabs vs ProxyShare
The Oxylabs Proxy vs ProxyShare comparison reveals two services targeting different market segments with distinct value propositions. The choice between them depends primarily on your specific requirements, budget constraints, and scale of operations.
Choose Oxylabs If:
- You require enterprise-grade reliability and performance
- Your operations involve high-volume data collection (500GB+ monthly)
- Advanced targeting and filtering capabilities are essential
- You need dedicated support and account management
- Budget allows for premium pricing in exchange for superior features
- Compliance and security certifications are important
Choose ProxyShare If:
- Cost-effectiveness is a primary concern
- Your usage is moderate (under 200GB monthly)
- You need straightforward proxy services without complex features
- You’re a small business or individual user
- Simple setup and user-friendly interface are priorities
- Standard performance levels meet your requirements
Both services offer free trials, allowing you to test performance and compatibility with your specific use cases before committing to a paid plan. This hands-on evaluation is highly recommended given the significant differences in pricing and feature sets.
Make Your Choice Today
Start with free trials from both providers to experience the difference firsthand and make an informed decision based on your actual requirements.
Start Oxylabs Free Trial Try ProxyShare FreeIn conclusion, this Oxylabs vs ProxyShare comparison demonstrates that both services excel in their respective market segments. Oxylabs dominates the enterprise space with superior performance and features, while ProxyShare provides excellent value for cost-conscious users seeking reliable proxy services without premium pricing. Your choice should align with your specific needs, budget, and growth projections to ensure optimal return on investment.
Disclosure: We may earn commission for purchases that are made by visitors on this site at no additional cost on your end. All information is for educational purposes and is not intended for financial advice. Read our affiliate disclosure.
