ScrapingAnt vs Scrape.do: Complete Comparison Guide
Comprehensive analysis of two leading web scraping APIs to help you choose the best solution for your data extraction needs
When choosing between ScrapingAnt vs Scrape.do, you’re comparing two powerful web scraping APIs that offer distinct advantages for different use cases. This comprehensive comparison examines both services across key metrics including pricing, performance, features, and user satisfaction to help you make an informed decision.
Whether you’re evaluating Scrape.do vs ScrapingAnt for enterprise data extraction, competitive intelligence, or automated monitoring, this analysis covers everything from success rates and response times to API credit costs and customer support quality.
Both platforms offer robust solutions for bypassing anti-bot systems, handling JavaScript-heavy sites, and scaling data collection operations. However, their different approaches to pricing, proxy management, and feature sets make them suitable for different types of projects and budgets.
Service Overview
ScrapingAnt
Founded in 2020, ScrapingAnt positions itself as an enterprise-grade scraping API with “ant-sized pricing.” The service focuses on providing unlimited concurrency and comprehensive anti-bot bypass capabilities through a combination of datacenter and residential proxies.
Key Statistics:
- • 99.99% uptime over the last year
- • 85.5% anti-scraping avoidance rate
- • 90,000+ datacenter proxies
- • Unlimited concurrent requests
Scrape.do
Scrape.do offers a comprehensive web scraping solution with a focus on residential and mobile proxies. The platform emphasizes high success rates and fast response times, with specialized features for handling modern web applications.
Key Statistics:
- • 99.9% uptime over the last 6 months
- • 99%+ success rate (customer reported)
- • 95M+ premium proxy network
- • 5-minute average support response time
Performance Comparison
Performance Benchmarks
Based on independent testing by Scrapeway and user-reported metrics, here’s how both services perform in real-world scenarios:
| Metric | ScrapingAnt | Scrape.do | Industry Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Success Rate | 34.2% | 99%+ (reported) | 59.3% |
| Average Response Time | 11.0s | 0.8-0.9s | 9.4s |
| Uptime | 99.99% | 99.9% | 99.5% |
| Cost per 1K Requests | $1.81 | $0.116-$0.71 | $3.20 |
Performance Analysis
The performance comparison reveals significant differences between the two services:
- • Scrape.do shows superior success rates and faster response times, making it ideal for high-volume operations
- • ScrapingAnt offers better uptime reliability and more predictable performance
- • Both services outperform industry averages in specific areas while having trade-offs in others
Pricing Analysis
ScrapingAnt Pricing
Free Plan
10,000 API credits/month
Enthusiast – $19/month
100,000 API credits
Startup – $49/month
500,000 API credits
Business – $249/month
3,000,000 API credits
API Credit Costs:
- • Simple request: 1 credit
- • JS rendering: 10 credits
- • Residential proxy: 25 credits
- • JS + Residential: 125 credits
Scrape.do Pricing
Free Plan
1,000 API credits/month
Hobby – $29/month
250,000 API credits
Pro – $99/month
1,250,000 API credits
Business – $249/month
3,500,000 API credits
Request Costs:
- • Datacenter proxy: 1 credit
- • Residential proxy: 10 credits
- • JS rendering: 25 credits
- • Only successful requests charged
Cost Comparison Analysis
When comparing ScrapingAnt vs Scrape.do pricing, several key factors emerge:
ScrapingAnt Advantages:
- • Lower entry point ($19 vs $29)
- • Better free tier (10,000 vs 1,000 credits)
- • More predictable pricing structure
- • Unlimited concurrency included
Scrape.do Advantages:
- • Only charges for successful requests
- • Better value at higher volumes
- • Lower cost per successful request
- • No charges for failed requests
Feature Comparison
| Feature | ScrapingAnt | Scrape.do |
|---|---|---|
| Proxy Types | Datacenter, Residential | Datacenter, Residential, Mobile |
| JavaScript Rendering | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Geolocation Support | 15 countries | 150+ countries |
| Session Management | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Screenshots | ✅ Full/Visible | ✅ Full/Partial |
| Webhook Support | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Custom Headers | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Browser Automation | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
| AI Data Extraction | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| LLM-Ready Output | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes (Markdown) |
ScrapingAnt Unique Features
- AI-powered structured data extraction
- Unlimited concurrent requests
- Custom JS evaluation (up to 60s)
- Specialized APIs for specific targets
Scrape.do Unique Features
- Browser automation and interactions
- Mobile proxy support
- 150+ country geotargeting
- Only charges for successful requests
Ease of Use
ScrapingAnt
Integration
Simple REST API with comprehensive documentation. Supports Python, JavaScript, and other popular languages.
Setup Time
Quick setup with API key authentication. Web UI for testing and experimentation.
Learning Curve
Moderate – requires understanding of credit system and parameter optimization.
Scrape.do
Integration
Dual-mode API (REST and Proxy). Extensive documentation with code examples for multiple languages.
Setup Time
Under 30 seconds integration claim. Token-based authentication with immediate access.
Learning Curve
Easy – straightforward parameter system with clear cost structure.
Customer Support
ScrapingAnt Support
Scrape.do Support
User Reviews & Testimonials
ScrapingAnt Reviews
“Onboarding and API integration was smooth and clear. Everything works great. The support was excellent. Overall a great scraper.”
– Illia K., Android Software Developer
“Great communication with co-founders helped me to get the job done. Great proxy diversity and good price.”
– Andrii M., Senior Software Engineer
“This product helps me to scale and extend my business. The API is easy to integrate and support is really good.”
– Dmytro T., Senior Software Engineer
Scrape.do Reviews
“We have reached the speed average like 800ms-900ms per each request and %99+ success rate which is amazing.”
– Yigit K., Product Manager
“The latency isn’t bad, and we hardly ever have problems with proxies failing during testing runs.”
– Emre E., CEO
“The average response times of their API credits are far away better than the Scraper API. And they have top-notch customer service.”
– Hasan T., Co-Founder
Related: Apify vs Scraperapi
Best Use Cases
ScrapingAnt is Best For:
-
AI/ML Projects
Built-in AI extraction and LLM-ready outputs
-
Budget-Conscious Projects
Lower entry point and generous free tier
-
Developer-Focused Solutions
Extensive API customization and JS evaluation
-
High-Concurrency Needs
Unlimited concurrent requests
Scrape.do is Best For:
-
High-Performance Applications
Superior success rates and fast response times
-
Global Data Collection
150+ countries with mobile proxy support
-
Interactive Web Applications
Browser automation and user interaction simulation
-
Cost-Effective Scaling
Pay only for successful requests
Related: Scraperapi vs ScrapingAnt
Conclusion & Recommendations
The Verdict: ScrapingAnt vs Scrape.do
Both ScrapingAnt and Scrape.do offer robust web scraping solutions, but they excel in different areas and serve different user needs. Your choice should depend on your specific requirements, budget, and technical expertise.
Choose ScrapingAnt if you:
- • Need AI-powered data extraction
- • Want unlimited concurrent requests
- • Have a limited budget (lower entry point)
- • Require extensive API customization
- • Value predictable pricing
Choose Scrape.do if you:
- • Need maximum success rates
- • Require fast response times
- • Want global geotargeting (150+ countries)
- • Need browser automation features
- • Prefer paying only for successful requests
Final Recommendation
For most users, Scrape.do offers better value due to its superior performance metrics, extensive global coverage, and “pay for success” model. However, ScrapingAnt is excellent for developers who need AI extraction capabilities and unlimited concurrency at a lower entry price.
Both services offer free trials, so we recommend testing both with your specific use case to determine which performs better for your needs.
Disclosure: We may earn commission for purchases that are made by visitors on this site at no additional cost on your end. All information is for educational purposes and is not intended for financial advice. Read our affiliate disclosure.
